Friday, September 7, 2012

Fuse Together, Fall Together

I was amazed to read the consequences of cohesiveness. Too much cohesion in a group can ultimately lead to it's destruction. In the early stages of a group coming together and team building, the decision making process is improved, but should the group get to close, the opposite becomes true in an effort to maintain and protect the group cohesion and the people in it. Much like a husband agrees to cover for a murder his wife committed, when  group becomes to close, its efforts and decisions are geared toward protecting only that. It can happen very easily. Lets take a hypothetical situation: a new employee comes into an established group. This person is new and has ideas for improvement and change. The group sees these improvements as a threat to the existing situation. After a short time, even great and simple ideas that could help the group grow are turned down out of spite and need for protection. Soon this person feels rejected and even discriminated against. Even though the color of that persons skin had no bearing on the way they were treated, the group could quickly find itself facing employment discrimination charges without ever knowing they were guilty of it. Group think is how groups get convinced of following through with things that are in the best interest of the group instead of the best interest of others and the growth of the group. This is happening all the time and it has an up and down, or cyclical, effect. If you watch closely the groups around you, they go through ups and downs that are often land marked  by a person coming or going from group think that forms for a short time.

2 comments:

  1. Hey Midwest, good job on your post. Even I was surprised to read the consequences of cohesiveness. But I can associate this phenomenon to a real life experience that has happened in my work place where a newcomer, who came in with fresh innovative ideas, was not welcome for reasons that threatened the existing mindset of the group. The newcomer felt dejected because of the rejection by his subordinates, and eventually built a wrong notion about his team. This definitely created negative vibes in the work place that seemed to be biased towards a certain group of people. Also this was no good in long term and affected the overall output of the group.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi,

    I agree with you that it is interesting to hear that as much as cohesiveness can help a group, there are consequences as well. As you said, a group becoming too close can ultimately lead to it’s destruction as a dynamic that is too close between group members can actually work against them in the end. This reminds me of middle and high school when teachers used to separate friends of the same group to prevent them from working together. I used to be upset when this would happen; however, looking back now it was probably a blessing in disguise as they were really only looking out for our best interest.

    ReplyDelete